๐Ÿšš gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.6/5 from 205+ reviews
Electronics โœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.6 out of 5 (205 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14
$23.33
Sale
โœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Phones dont work, for parts only.They turn On when charged but battery drains rapid.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
rapid fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot

Phones dont work, for parts only.
They turn On when charged but battery drains swift.​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Electronics products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 648975

Category: Electronics > Cell Phones & Accessories > Other

Original Price: $23.33 USD

Sale Price: $14 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.6
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1836 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Five stars!
the Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot works well enough and it meets expectations.
16 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Denver, CO

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot is practical for me.
11 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase​
2 months ago ยท Tucson, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
remarkably pleased
To be fair, it is straightforward to use which feels reasonable.
3 people found this helpful​
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
purely what I wanted
Satisfied overall.
37 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply remarkable
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot arrived as expected.
33 people found this helpful